A Christian Worldview and Environmentalism

6 05 2009

(Recently I had to write a paper for my Senior Worldview Seminar class. Though I don’t consider it my greatest masterpiece, I decided to post it anyway. For one thing I’m woefully overdue in posting anything at all, and for another, it addresses a subject I think needs addressing. Enjoy.)

__________

Anyone who has even a mild awareness of the issues pervading modern society will know that environmentalism is an extremely popular topic. Global warming, animal rights, and environmental preservation, are, for the time being, deeply entrenched in our thinking and policy making. Nowadays, wherever one may look everyone is “going green.” Politicians, movie stars, and big corporations are touting the virtues of going green and compelling the masses to join them. Those who refuse to join are villanized and condemned as politically incorrect.

But environmentalism is not a new phenomenon; it has been around for a long time. But it has grown in intensity in the last few years – especially the push to “go green.” There reigns a general panic about the condition of the planet, and everyone seems to have a new tip on how to “save money while saving the environment.”

And yet, for all it’s popularity and undeniable impact on how we live and work, the subject of environmentalism is notably absent in most serious discussions among conservative evangelical Christians. And though I wish to address the principles and philosophies underlying environmentalism as a whole, I wish to aim my discussion at the party mentioned. To begin, how can Christians be “salt and light” in the world (Matthew 5:13-16) and be unwilling to talk about the most turbulent issues present within their society? Worse, how can Christians be salt and light and be completely ignorant of those issues? And yet I fear most conservative evangelicals are, at best, unwilling to discuss environmental issues, and, at worst, completely ignorant of them.

Now, some may argue that environmentalism is a trivial issue and has nothing really to do with Christians being “salt and light.” What does it matter that a few fanatics are sitting in front of bulldozers to protest the development of some swampland? There are far more important issues to deal with; carbon emissions are hardly worth our time.

But I disagree. For in fact, environmentalism is about far more than the responsible use of resources; it is about far more than governmental policy-making. Rather, there is an underlying worldview present within environmentalism that renders it an issue worth our time. There is a deep-seated and destructive philosophy that drives the environmental movement that cannot be ignored by the church. Environmentalism’s very prevalence within our society ought to clue us in to it’s importance.

When conservative evangelical Christians hear the subject of the environment brought up, I believe what comes to our minds is along the lines of recycling, alternative fuels, reduced waste, saving the whales, etc. And if this were all the environmental movement amounted to, then the issue might not hold so much importance. But there are far deeper issues at stake. And for the church to ignore this movement can only spell trouble for the future. Because the whole environmental movement is driven by an anti-Biblical worldview. There are some key underlying philosophies and principles that must not be ignored. Recycling and the push for alternative fuel sources are merely the outflow of a deep-seated worldview that cannot be pushed aside by the church as a trivial issue that holds no bearing on them. In fact environmentalism holds great influence, not only in American society, but in Western society as a whole.

I want to examine some of the philosophies underlying the environmental movement and look at where we as Christians ought to stand on environmentalism as a whole. But first let me first narrow my discussion topic. Though there are many facets of the topic of environmentalism, not all can be discussed now. Prevalent within any discussion of environmental issues is the subject of global warming, but I will not discuss this here. Whether or not global warming is real, is caused by humans, or is purely a political scheme is certainly a controversial topic that needs to be discussed, but the principles and philosophies that I will address will deal with global warming, if only in principle. What I really wish to address is a question that deals more with the practical than with the purely philosophical: should Christians “go green?” Is environmental activism something Christians should steer clear from? Or should Christians be the strongest activists? I hope that my discussion of this topic will shed some light on where Christians should be standing in relation to the green movement.

Modern Society and Environmentalism

Though one might think environmentalism a fairly new phenomenon, the environmental movement actually has it’s beginning around the middle of the 19th century.

          ”While many people associate the beginning of the green movement with Rachel Carson’s breakthrough book Silent Spring and the legislative fervor of the 1970s, environmentalism is in fact rooted in the intellectual thought of the 1830s and 1840s. In fact, the “environmental movement” is a significant thread in the fabric of American philosophical thought – first developed by the Transcendentalists (most famously Henry David Thoreau) but tangibly expanded upon during the era of American pragmatism in the latter half of the 19th century.” (webecoist.com)

Since it’s beginnings long ago, the environmental movement has grown from it‘s philosophical foundations into an all-encompassing way of life – philosophically and practically. Western society as a whole is permeated by environmental concerns and seemingly lives in search of some way to preserve itself and the planet forever. It must be granted that some within the environmental movement have raised valid concerns about the abuse of the earth and it’s resources as the following quote will show (in a rather exaggerated manner).

          ”And Man created the plastic bag and the tin and aluminum can and the cellophane wrapper and the paper plate, and this was good because Man could then take his automobile and buy all his food in one place and He could save that which was good to eat in the refrigerator and throw away that which had no further use.  And soon the earth was covered with plastic bags and aluminum cans and paper plates and disposable bottles and there was nowhere to sit down or walk, and Man shook his head and cried:  “Look at this [really big :) ] mess.” (Art Buchwald, 1970)

But the environmental movement is concerned with far more than responsible care for the planet. There is, within the movement, the idea that humans are harming the planet as they seek to conquer it. E. B. White demonstrated this kind of thinking when he said, “I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority.”

But some environmentalists go so far as to say that humans are actually a detriment to the planet. David Graber, a biologist, said,

          ”I know scientists who remind me that people are part of nature, but it isn’t true. Somewhere along the line … we quit the contract and became a cancer. We have become a plague upon ourselves and upon the Earth…. Until such time as Homo sapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along.”

Dave Forman, founder of Earth First! went so far as to say, “Phasing out the human race will solve every problem on earth, social and environmental.” Obviously, quotes such as these do not represent a Christian worldview. And this is why Christians cannot ignore environmentalism. Environmental causes are not stand-along entities; they are the outflow of a warped and anti-Biblical worldview.

A core component of the worldview underlying environmentalism is a virtual worship of the earth as a god. Darryl Cherney demonstrated this when he said, “I’m not an environmentalist.  I’m an Earth warrior.” Francis Bacon said, “We cannot command Nature except by obeying her” and E.F. Schumacher said, “The system of nature, of which man is a part, tends to be self-balancing, self-adjusting, self-cleansing.  Not so with technology.”

A more absurd demonstration of the twisted thinking behind environmentalism was seen in The Washington Post: “Why do people give each other flowers? To celebrate various important occasions, they’re killing living creatures? Why restrict it to plants? ‘Sweetheart, let’s make up. Have this deceased squirrel.’”

Christians and Environmentalism

So where do Christians (broadly speaking) stand on environmental issues? They are not unified. But to understand why they are divided, let’s explore briefly what the Bible says about the environment. Genesis 1:1 says, “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” After creating the earth and all that is in it, God created man – the crown jewel of creation – and verses 28-30 say,

          “Then God blessed them, and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the earth.” 29 And God said, “See, I have given you every herb that yields seed which is on the face of all the earth, and every tree whose fruit yields seed; to you it shall be for food. 30 Also, to every beast of the earth, to every bird of the air, and to everything that creeps on the earth, in which there is life, I have given every green herb for food”; and it was so.”

From the beginning, the Christian worldview undermines one of the core aspects of the environmentalist worldview which, at best, views man and nature as equals, and, at worst, views nature as superior to man. It also undermines another one of the chief aspects of environmentalism – that the earth’s resources should be preserved and used as little as possible, if at all.

In reality, God gave us the earth’s resources to use. But where Christians should go from here has led to some division. Revelation 21:1 says, “Now I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away. Also there was no more sea.” Several times the Bible says that the earth we are living on will pass away. This has led some Christians to argue that it doesn’t matter how we treat the environment – it will all get burned up some day anyway. But others, citing such verses as Deuteronomy 22:6-7 (which says,

          If a bird’s nest happens to be before you along the way, in any tree or on the ground, with young ones or eggs, with the mother sitting on the young or on the eggs, you shall not take the mother with the young; 7 you shall surely let the mother go, and take the young for yourself, that it may be well with you and that you may prolong your days.)

have argued that the Bible calls for responsible usage of the environment.

Donald G. Kaufman and Cecilia M. Franz make a rather interesting observation when they say,

          “Christianity, with its roots in Judaism, was a major factor in the development of the Western worldview…. A basic Christian belief was that God gave humans dominion over creation, with the freedom to use the environment as they saw fit.  Another important Judeo-Christian belief predicted that God would bring a cataclysmic end to the Earth sometime in the future.  One interpretation of this belief is that the Earth is only a temporary way station on the soul’s journey to the afterlife.  Because these beliefs tended to devalue the natural world, they fostered attitudes and behaviors that had a negative effect on the environment.”

Though they may not have been right in their conclusion that all Christians hold a devalued view of the natural world, they do latch onto an important point – that some Christians have developed a disregard for the environment based on a rather narrow focus on the Bible.

But while some Christians have gone almost “anti-environment,” others have basically joined forces with the environmentalists. One of the most notable incidents of this came with the publishing of the Green Bible. The Green Bible (published by Harper One and endorsed by the Sierra Club and the Humane Society of the United States) has “[v]erses and passages that speak to God’s care for creation highlighted in green” (greenletterbible.com). Not only that, but, “The Green Bible is printed on recyclable paper, and has recyclable bindings. The ink is soy based” (stand-firm.blogspot.com).

But the publishing of the Green Bible is fraught with problems. Aside from highlighting verses that (in context) have absolutely nothing to do with environmental care, “The Green Bible appears to be turning the Bible into a political football. All kinds of environmentalists are treating this Bible as a giant proof text for environmental causes” (stand-firm.blogspot.com). The blogger from “stand-firm” summed it up well with the statement, “The best advice to The Green Bible reader is to stick your green-letter edition of the Bible on the shelf, or even recycle it.”

Should Christians Go Green?

So what do we make of all this? Should Christians go green? I certainly believe that God never intended Christians to abuse the earth, but, in fact, expects us to use it’s resources responsibly. But what about joining the environmental movement? If one will step back and examine the philosophies behind environmentalism (that nature is equal to or superior to man, that earths resources ought not be used – as God intended them to be, etc.) then I do not believe that a Christian can reasonable join with the environmentalists and “go green.”

But does this mean that Christians should look down on environmental causes. Certainly not! In fact, conservative evangelicals have avoided this issue for far too long. God Himself has given us this earth and we should take care of it and use it’s resources responsibly. If this means recycling and monitoring our use of electricity, water, etc., then we certainly should do our best in these areas. But to identify with a worldview that devalues human life, deifies nature, and completely ignores the Creator is, in my opinion, an un-Biblical move. We as Christian ought to promote responsibility, all-the-while keeping in mind the fact that using natural resources is not a crime (or a sin), and that we are to “have dominion” over the earth (Genesis 1:28). After all, this is what the Creator mandated.

__________

For resources used click here.





You can just skip over this post…

8 04 2009

Really.

A while back I began to think about some of the highlights of my five years at GBS. Now before you think I’m going to get sentimental or anything, don’t worry. I shall shed no tears during the writing of this post.

This is short, incomplete list – and the items listed will not necessarily be in chronological order or in order of importance – but here are a few:

#1: Freshman year – Age of Empires: The Conquerors Expansion

What, you thought I was going to say something about life-long friendships?… Ask those of us who stayed up ’til 2am every Friday night to battle it out over the dorm network – it was awesome! Now, I wasn’t the best player in the dorm (Doug, I’ll beat you someday… not), but I was a force to be reckoned with. I won my share of games – when Doug wasn’t playing – but win or lose, it was fun just to play. Go Teutons!

#2: Reflection

The group, not what you do at the end of the year. I mean really, getting to travel and play bass guitar all over the country? Well, ok – mainly OH, IN, and KY. And a few other places. But definitely one of the best highlights.

#3: Choir Tour 2008

Just ask those of us who were there. Hands down THE best choir tour ever!

#4: Doctrine of Holiness

I cannot finish this (abbreviated) list of GBS highlights without mentioning Doctrine of Holiness class. To any freshmen who may be reading this post who have not yet taken DoH, let me simply say this: Ahh ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!…

It’s a very good class but… well, the Notes.





*Deep Breath*…

8 03 2009

OK, here goes (if you care to know):

> Let’s see – I got back from choir tour – in one piece – and here’s a picture for you:

isaac_iron_2

 

Yes, good people – this is Isaac and his, uh… rather inventive way of heating up his chicken sandwhich. (Never mind that there was a microwave oven in the room behind him.)

> I too managed, along with probably half of the choir at least, to show symptoms of a cold in the days following choir tour. The good news, though, is that it was a pretty mild cold and the misery was at a minimum. (Hallelujah!)

> No, I won’t be posting a ton of pictures from choir tour here. If you want to see pictures, go see my Facebook. (If you’re not my friend, ask to be. If you don’t have a Facebook account, get one and then ask to be my friend. If you don’t know what Facebook is I can’t help you.)

> HOMEWORK!!! *sob* …I think that about covers it.

> Graduation is coming up and I have no idea what I’m going to do after I graduate. Of course, I might not have to worry about that if I don’t figure out the homework thing….

> I got a phone call yesterday (Saturday) afternoon and now I’m working on a video for the Jr. / Sr. / Valentines Banquet. Oh boy, do I have some work to do! It will probably be only 10 min. long, but in editing terms – that’s a few hours worth of work.

> I love the warm weather. I hope it lasts. Last Friday was so nice I went down to Riverfront and rollerbladed in the new section of park for a while. Very nice.

> Ok, this is kind of short but I think this post is done.





Suffering in a far-away land…

22 02 2009

Folks, it’s tough. I mean, how would you like to suffer in a place like Florida in February?

Oh. Uh, you can put your hands down now.

Anyway, Choir Tour is going really well. We’ve had some good services and we’ve had a lot of fun. Hopefully I’ll post some pictures when I get back. (Come to think of it, maybe I should start taking some – beyond the 15 I have right now :D .)





In Other News…

4 02 2009

The National Accociation for the Recognition and Adoration of Great People and their Totally Brilliant Ideas (NARAGPTBI) is honoring me (yes, me) with a prestigious award at their next (internationally televised) awards ceremony. I will be there, accompanied by a few almost-as-famous-as-me people, to be publically (and properly) awarded for my outstanding achievement.

My friends, the world is about to officially recognize (finally) my life-time achievement: overcoming narcissism.

Send your congratulations through the “comments” link below. I deserve them.





It Could Have Been Worse

29 01 2009

I recently made mention of the fact that I nearly had my legs amputated by a train. (See “Two birds with one stone” #13 below) Having received curious inquiries as to the nature of the said incident, I will now enlighten the public with a story. Be fore-warned: there are no graphic or disturbing images. No dramatic or intense scenes unfold and no one is seen screaming or running for help. To the contrary, the whole account is, unfortunately, rather un-entertaining. Nevertheless, my story:

~~~

It happened in a far-away place. (Actually, that much is true. Unless you call south-east Ukraine your home. Which I’m sure most of you do not.) I would love to tell you the name of the Ukrainian village where I was, but, as I have yet to discover how to pronounce the name of that village in plain English, it shall here-after be referred to as the Un-named Village. (Or U-V.)

U-V is a small village. And when I say small, I mean very small. It’s so small it doesn’t show up on a map – even a Ukrainian map. I looked. U-V consists basically of a single paved road (perhaps 3/4 of a mile long – but I’m terrible with distances) with houses, a church, and a few other buildings along either side. At one end, this paved road turns into a dirt two-track that winds through some fields, ending up at a main highway. At the other end, the paved road turns into a short stretch of gravel road that comes near to some rail-road tracks running nearly perpendicular to the road. And at the near-center of the paved road there connects another paved road, U-V’s main connection to Ukrainian civilization.

I mean to cast U-V in no bad light. It’s obscurity is half it’s charm. The peace and quiet to be found there are unrivaled by most places I’ve found in my life. And to walk down that road on a summer afternoon, past simple Ukrainian dwellings with goats and chickens milling about…. It’s a wonderful place to be sure.

But U-V’s obscurity also lends itself to a good deal of boredom for the foreigner. And today I was bored. So, for want of something to do, I decided that the railroad tracks would be a good place to look for entertainment.

I don’t suppose one would consider the traffic necessarily heavy on those tracks, but trains do pass through there with some regularity. And when a freight train would come rumbling by, I would warily approach to within 10 or 15 feet and stand there watching as the wheels flew by. I was ever conscious of the drastic results that would follow should I be struck, but I ignored the warnings. (I think it would have been cool to have stuck out my hand and actually touched the train. Don’t tell my mother.)

One game I played to amuse myself was to see how far I could walk on one of the rails without falling off. On one particular attempt I proceeded to balance for about 200 feet down the tracks (it could have been 100 – I’m terrible with distances), but I soon tired of this game. So I decided to sit.

Two platforms, perhaps 60 or 70 feet long, ran along either side of the tracks for loading and unloading passengers. Although it was a warm afternoon, it was pleasant enough to just sit and observe the countryside. As I sat on the platform with my feet over the edge, I was able to look up and down the tracks and observe trains coming from both directions. (There were two sets of tracks.)

As I sat there, I saw a passenger train approaching on the near-side tracks. As the train got closer I heard it’s whistle blow. Although I knew it was uncommon for trains to blow their whistles over that particular stretch of track, I thought that perhaps it was blown to indicate a friendly “hello;” or perhaps I was being warned of the train’s approach as a simple precaution. Seeing no particular need to take action I continued to watch as the train approached. Yet the closer the train got, the more frantic the whistling became.

Perhaps the boredom was affecting my brain. Or perhaps it was my inability to judge distances that was about to cost me life and/or limb. Whatever the case, it never occurred to me that my current position was a very dangerous one. For it seemed to me that there existed quite a satisfactory distance between me and the nearest rail. What never occurred to me was the fact that trains are wider than their tracks. And the fact that I was sitting on a loading platform didn’t register in my mind either.

As I sat there with the train bearing down on me, it’s whistle blasting repeatedly, the thought came to me that perhaps the conductor was the overly cautious type who didn’t appreciate the fact that my legs were hanging over the edge of the platform. So, obligingly, I slowly pulled my legs up onto the platform seconds before the train flew by.

I don’t suppose I need to describe much about what I felt next. I think the feeling could best be described as a startling realization. As I stared at the train cars blurring by (inches away rather than feet), I realized that I could be watching the spectacle minus two legs. I must say that I suddenly had much less interest in seeing how close I could get to the trains. In fact, I had much less interest in being near the train tracks at all.

After milling about a bit more (all the while thinking about how close I had come to a very unpleasant ending – for my lower appendages anyway) I finally lost interest in the train tracks altogether and wandered away.

As I have said before, it isn’t exactly a thrilling account. Nevertheless, the reaction I get when I tell people I nearly had my legs cut off by a train is somewhat amusing. Now I think I need to go work on that whole distance thing….





I think I can take it…

27 01 2009

Normally, I really dis-like being awakened, especially early in the morning. But this morning I was awakened.

Early.

Early as in, say, 6:00 am. But this time I was happy to have been awakened because what awakened me was an announcement – an announcement that actually afforded me the opportunity to sleep longer than I would have been able to otherwise. Aren’t snow days great?

All right!!! Let’s have a cook-out!!! :-D





Two Birds with One Stone

27 01 2009

The following has been copied and pasted from Facebook. I actually get a new post on my blog and I satisfy the Facebook community with 25 things that have absolutely no relevance to a more fulfilled and productive life.


So I’ve been tagged twice – first in “25 Things” and then in “25 Things About Me.” To save space (and because I don’t want to try to think of 50 things to write :-D ) I’m going to combine them and write 25 things. Some will be random and some will be about me.

Works for me.

So here goes:

 

1. I hope I can think of 25 things that won’t be to completely mindless.
2. I love music. (I’m listening to it right now. Well maybe not right now…. I was when I wrote this.)
3. I’ve never gone bungee-jumping. I want to though – I think.
4. I love snow skiing.
5. I play the bass guitar.
6. I’ve been to Paris and Rome.

7. I want to visit London.
8. I’ve never wished I had a pet hamster so I could name him Hammie. No, really.
9. I’m not very good at math.
10. I like writing, spelling, grammar, and all that other stuff that a lot of people dislike so much.
11. I hope I don’t go and misspell something in the post. That wouldn’t look verry good.
12. Ha, you thought you caught me! Yes, I know I misspelled “goode.”
13. I almost got my legs cut off by a train.
14. Not everyone knows how to pronounce my last name correctly – even though it’s only 4 letters long. Kinda funny actually.
15. The Cleveland Indians are my favorite sports team.
16. Most (OK, maybe make that all) of my family are Pittsburgh Steelers fans. I’m a Cleveland Browns fan. Yeah, fun.
17. I promise # 13 is true.
18. I’ve never been pulled over by a cop – not at the time of writing this anyway.
19. I can read (some) Koine Greek. (Pronounced coy’-nay)
20. I have a bad reaction to Novocaine. (Yes, it stinks. Especially when you have to get work done on your teeth.)
21. June 17, 1789 – In France, the Third Estate declares itself the national assembly. (OK, that’s from Wikipedia.)
22. I promise #18 is true too.
23. I hope someone out there in the world of Facebook enjoys this post of 25 things.
24. The spell checker just flagged “Facebook” in #23. Something’s wrong here don’t you think?
25. All those people who find the genie who gives them three wishes need to get smart. If a genie offered me three wishes, the first thing I’d do is ask for unlimited wishes. (Maybe that’s why a genie hasn’t offered me three wishes – he’s no dummy.)
26. I don’t need a genie to give me number 26 in a 25 point list. :-)





Irony – From the End of the Universe

8 01 2009

So about this Greek thing…. The text book is named Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: An exegetical syntax of the New Testament. And I can think of only a few things that could make me laugh less. But laugh I did.

In a most ironic twist the author included a quote from  Douglas Adams. What do New Testament Greek and Douglas Adams have in common you ask?

Absolutely nothing.

But he included the quote to make a point about the complexities of verb tenses and the struggles that grammar students face. It was a point well made I must say.

blog-wallace

“In Douglas Adams’ delightfully insane The Restaurant at the End of the Universe is a brief chapter describing the major problem in time travel:

‘The major problem is quite simply one of grammar, and the main work to consult in this matter is Dr. Dan Streetmentioner’s Time Traveler’s Handbook of 1001 Tense Formations. It will tell you, for instance, how to describe something that was about to happen to you in the past before you avoided it by time-jumping forward two days in order to avoid it. The event will be described differently according to whether you are talking about it from the standpoint of your own natural time, from a time in the further future, or a time in the further past and is further complicated by the possibility of conducting conversations while you are actually traveling from one time to another with the intention of becoming your own mother or father.

‘Most readers get as far as the Future Semiconditionally Modified Subinverted Plagal Past Subjunctive Intentional before giving up; and in fact in later editions of the book all the pages beyond this point have been left blank to save on printing costs.’”

 

You know, I couldn’t have said it better myself.





Being Myself

5 01 2009

In adherance to the advice of the people at ikevision, I shall not be like everyone else and shall make no mention of the fact that’s it’s a new semester – not to mention a new year – and that the coming 360 days hold new opportunities, new challenges, and new horizons. So, in an effor to be different….

Wait, was the point to be different? or just be myself?….

No matter. In an effort to be different, I shall begin (what’s left of the beginning of) this post with a quote from Oscar Wilde: “Most people are other people. Their thoughts are someone elses opinions, their lives a mimicry, their passions a quotation.”

Nope. I shall not be like anyone else.

 

Come to think of it, I could talk about how dim my outlook of this new semester and year is, how my life is going down the drain, and how, if the sky really were falling, it might actually be an improvement. That wouldn’t be like everyone else.

Actually, I could talk about my New Years resolution – a subject everyone is talking about this time of year – in an effor to show that I’m not like everyone else. My New Years resolution: to not make any New Years resolutions. So far I’m holding up just fine.

I think….

So I’m back. And so is school. And may we get along just fine.